Veganu kraujas?
-
- naujokas
- Posts: 43
- Joined: 2017-10-21 18:13
gerai,gal jau cia neignoruosit manes, mokslinikai atliko tyrima ir teigia, STUDY FINDS VEGAN BLOOD IS 8 TIMES MORE EFFECTIVE AT KILLING CANCER CELLS, tai ar tai tiesa? kokios mintys kyla perskaicius? https://www.ornish.com/wp-content/uploa ... Cancer.pdf
-
- naujokas
- Posts: 43
- Joined: 2017-10-21 18:13
bet cia tyrimas buvo atliktas tik prostatos veziu sergantiems asmenims.
visu pirma buvo keiciama ne tik mityba bet visas gyvenimo budas. pridetas nemazas kiekis fizinio aktyvumo tad pats tyrimas nebuvo izoliuotas tik kaip mitybos pokytis.
atkreipkit demesi i pacio tyrimo aprasa ir isvadas:
<..>However, 2 recent articles failed to show any effect of a diet low in fat and high in fiber, fruits and vegetables on
PSA after 4 years in men who did not have prostate cancer<..>
paciu autoriu teigimu tyrimas dar nebaigtas ir prasta tyrimo izoliacija neleidzia pagristi kad veganizmas cia pagrindinis faktorius:
<...>A limitation of the current study is that it cannot provide definitive conclusions concerning the effect of our intervention on disease specific survival. Any intervention, including diet and lifestyle, may affect the progression of prostate cancer without necessarily affecting survival<..>
pagal komentara tyrimas isvis nepavykes arba dar net neipusejes:
<..>The fact that no one switched to active therapy in the experimental group is no surprise Relative PSA decreases in the experimental group, while “significant,” were meager, especially when one considers that the coefficient of variation for most PSA assays is 15% and the number of patients in the groups is relatively small. Also, PSA decrease differences do not necessarily translate into differences in progression or survival. Experimental serum seemed to contain something that deferentially inhibited cell line growth but so what. Just because these serums were different does not mean that they were good. They might have also killed normal cells.<..>
susidaro ispudis kad sito linko jus pats ne neskaitet o laukiat kazkokiu komentaru.
atkreipkit demesi i pacio tyrimo aprasa ir isvadas:
<..>However, 2 recent articles failed to show any effect of a diet low in fat and high in fiber, fruits and vegetables on
PSA after 4 years in men who did not have prostate cancer<..>
paciu autoriu teigimu tyrimas dar nebaigtas ir prasta tyrimo izoliacija neleidzia pagristi kad veganizmas cia pagrindinis faktorius:
<...>A limitation of the current study is that it cannot provide definitive conclusions concerning the effect of our intervention on disease specific survival. Any intervention, including diet and lifestyle, may affect the progression of prostate cancer without necessarily affecting survival<..>
pagal komentara tyrimas isvis nepavykes arba dar net neipusejes:
<..>The fact that no one switched to active therapy in the experimental group is no surprise Relative PSA decreases in the experimental group, while “significant,” were meager, especially when one considers that the coefficient of variation for most PSA assays is 15% and the number of patients in the groups is relatively small. Also, PSA decrease differences do not necessarily translate into differences in progression or survival. Experimental serum seemed to contain something that deferentially inhibited cell line growth but so what. Just because these serums were different does not mean that they were good. They might have also killed normal cells.<..>
susidaro ispudis kad sito linko jus pats ne neskaitet o laukiat kazkokiu komentaru.
-
- naujokas
- Posts: 43
- Joined: 2017-10-21 18:13
Tiesa pasaket apie mane, pirmas ispudis si kart teisingas