Lionginas wrote: ↑2019-02-25 09:35
melodetektorius wrote: ↑2019-02-25 00:26
Mano nuomone, kai populiarių komikų gauja pastoviai baksnoja su tikslu parodyti, kad karalius yra nuogas, šio metodo efektyvumas gali skinti vaisius per sekančius rinkimus. Nuogas karalius nėra simpatiškas publikai.
JAV rinkimus nulemia tai, kiek savų rinkėjų kiekviena pusė sugeba prisikviesti į rinkimus. Todėl komikai čia nieko nenulems, kaip nenulems ir jokios kitos laidos. Bet pagal tai efektyvumą matuoti kvaila, nes šių laidu tikslas nėra nei perauklėti Trumpą ar pakeisti jo rinkėjų nuomonę, nei priversti jį nusišalinti nuo valdžios. Jų tikslas yra pasididinti savo reitingus, ir tai joms sekasi visai neblogai.
O kad Trumpui vienodai, tai netiesa, visiems puikiai žinoma, kad jis turi gana ploną odą. Bet apart žinučių Twitteryje aš išsiliejimo privačiai nelabai ką gali daugiau padaryti. Kaip kad pavyzdžiui
čia.
Visu pirma aš nesakau, kad komikai nulemia rinkimus ne, ne, ne. Aš teigiu, kad komikai kažkiek tai prisideda prie rinkėjų nuomonės apie kandidatą (ar kažkokius tai politikus) formavimo. Tai, kad politinė satyra neturi jokio poveikio yra netiesa.
Paimkim, kad ir šią apklausą (nors ji ir senoka):
http://www.people-press.org/2004/01/11/ ... -universe/
‘’And young people, by far the hardest to reach segment of the political news audience, are abandoning mainstream sources of election news and increasingly citing alternative outlets, including comedy shows such as the Daily Show and Saturday Night Live, as their source for election news.
Comedy programs are increasingly becoming regular sources of news for younger Americans, and are beginning to rival mainstream news outlets within this generation. Today, 21% of people under age 30 say they regularly learn about the campaign and the candidates from comedy shows like Saturday Night Live and the Daily Show, twice as many as said this four years ago (9%). (Note: In January 2000, the show Politically Incorrect was listed with Saturday Night Live, rather than the Daily Show.) And this is particularly true for younger men, 27% of whom regularly learn about the campaign from comedy shows, compared with 14% of young women.
Overall, one out of every two young people (50%) say they at least sometimes learn about the campaign from comedy shows, nearly twice the rate among people age 30-49 (27%) and four times the rate among people age 50 and older (12%).
Young people also are much more likely than older generations to learn about the campaign from late-night talk shows like Jay Leno and David Letterman, though there has been no increase from four years ago on this measure. Taken together, 61% say they regularly or sometimes learn about the campaign from comedy and/or late-night talk shows.’’
Čia taip pat gali paskaityti:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 115741.htm
“The study found that people with little interest in politics were more likely to select satirical over serious news.”
"It is not just entertaining -- it has a real-life impact on viewers."
"The important point is that satirical news did have an effect on political efficacy, as well as on political attitudes,"
"Satirical news shouldn't be disregarded just because its goal is to make people laugh. It still has an impact, just like serious news does."
Kad ir paimkime “Fey Effect”:
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define. ... y%20Effect
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBnaaKhIvS4